It’s no longer just brute force and sheer physical determination that define structural fire suppression operations. Aggressive firefighting must be redefined and aligned to the built environment and associated with goal oriented tactical operations that are defined by risk assessed and analyzed tasks that are executed under battle plans that promote the best in safety practices and survivability within know hostile structural fire environments. What are your thoughts and those around the kitchen table?
Has combat fire engagement changed, or are we just saying it does (or doesn't )?
Posts
